United States · Content and translation · 9 January 2024

Duolingo

About 10% of contractors cut as GPT translates sentences.

Status
Too early to tell
Roles
Not stated
The door
Translating sentences and writing lesson content
Last checked
21 October 2026
Next review
21 January 2027

Reported

What the sources say. Each statement ends with a note that carries its quote.

The role

A Duolingo spokesperson said the company uses GPT to translate sentences.1 Duolingo had 600 full-time employees in 2022, according to company filings.2

The change

Duolingo confirmed that it cut around 10% of its contractor workforce at the end of 2023.3 The company disputed calling the departures layoffs.4 It said only a small minority of contractors were let go as their projects wrapped.4 The company also confirmed to Bloomberg that part of the reason it no longer needed as many people was attributable to AI.5

What happened next

On 28 April 2025, Duolingo’s cofounder and chief executive, Luis von Ahn, posted an email to all employees on LinkedIn.6 According to von Ahn, the company will gradually stop using contractors to do work that AI can handle.7 A week later, he said he did not see AI replacing what employees do.8

Von Ahn told the Financial Times that he did not expect the amount of blowback.9

Open questions

  • Will Duolingo disclose how many contractors remain, or whether further contractor work moves to AI?
  • Will users or staff report errors in AI-generated lessons that human review did not catch?
  • Will Duolingo bring back human content staff or contractors?

Footnotes

  1. “A company spokesperson explained to us that GPT is used to translate sentences and then ‘human experts validate that the output quality is high enough for teaching and is in accordance with CEFR standards for what learners should be able to do at each CEFR level.’” ↩

  2. “Duolingo had 600 full-time employees in 2022, per company filings.” ↩

  3. “The company confirmed it cut around 10% of its contractor workforce at the end of 2023, as it turns to AI models like OpenAI’s GPT-4 to streamline content production and translations.” ↩

  4. “However, the company disputed calling the departures ‘layoffs,’ saying that only a ‘small minority’ of Duolingo’s contractors were let go as their projects wrapped.” ↩ ↩2

  5. “In a comment to Bloomberg, the company also confirmed that part of the reason it no longer needed as many people was attributable to AI.” ↩

  6. “On April 28, Duolingo cofounder and CEO Luis von Ahn posted an email on LinkedIn that he had just sent to all employees at his company.” ↩

  7. “According to von Ahn: ‘We’ll gradually stop using contractors to do work that AI can handle.’” ↩

  8. “A week later, von Ahn walked back his initial statements, clarifying that he does not ‘see AI replacing what our employees do’ but instead views it as a ‘tool to accelerate what we do, at the same or better level of quality.’” ↩

  9. “‘I did not expect the amount of blowback,’ he recently told the Financial Times.” ↩

The doorman reading

Analysis. This is the site’s reading of what the sources describe, not something they say.

No source has reported hidden work going missing yet, such as complaints, waits, overtime, rehiring or a reversal. The ledger looks for it at each review.

What they said

What the organisation said the change would do, in its own words.

“A company spokesperson explained to us that GPT is used to translate sentences and then “human experts validate that the output quality is high enough for teaching and is in accordance with CEFR standards for what learners should be able to do at each CEFR level.””

A Duolingo spokesperson, 9 January 2024Source S1

“According to von Ahn: “We’ll gradually stop using contractors to do work that AI can handle.””

Luis von Ahn, chief executive, 28 April 2025Source S2

Timeline

Every update, oldest first.

  1. 9 January 2024

    Too early to tell

    Company confirms about 10% of contractors cut at end of 2023.Source S1

  2. 9 June 2025

    Too early to tell

    CEO says he did not expect the blowback to the AI-first memo.Source S3

Changelog

Corrections, and when the case was last looked at.

No corrections so far.

Last checked 21 October 2026. No new reports since 9 June 2025.

Sources

Each source has an archived copy, so a statement can be checked after a page changes.

Report an error

We read every report. The desk checks it against the sources and records any correction on this page.

History of this case